2008 - Q1
The Bank Wars
In light of the current bloodshed in the Middle East, it is difficult to characterize this earlier
period in history as a ‘war’. It comes closer to construing the inherent properties of a battle. There
were two opposing sides, and each waged a fierce struggle over who would be empowered to
issue the fledgling nation’s money. No troops died, nor were any firearms discharged (other than
those fired at President Jackson himself).
While the case of the Second Bank of the United
States versus the American people is properly designated as a battle, it unfolds neatly in the
greater saga of a continuing cycle of such bank wars. The major actors in this national drama
were: Andrew Jackson, the popular populist U.S. President who fought on behalf of the people,
and Nicholas Biddle, president of the Second Bank of the United States, who fought in loyal
support of the moneyed class that owned and controlled the monopolistic institution. The war on
the Bank was unusual in that there was virtually no earlier personal interaction between these two
entities that would have indicated any such struggle lay ahead. At the time Andrew Jackson was
inaugurated as the seventh President of the United States, he had already secured a reputation
as a no-nonsense, tough, individualist. His nickname was "Old Hickory," a reference to the
toughest of the domestic hardwoods. His wife Rachel had died of a heart attack shortly before he
was inaugurated into the Presidency in March of 1829. Jackson believed that the insults and personal
attacks coming from bank-aligned John Quincy Adams and Henry Clay were responsible
for her death. He had defended her honor throughout their marriage against repeated allegations
that she was not yet divorced when she took on the role as Mrs. Jackson. Jackson had engaged
in at least eight duels, even killing one man (Charles Dickinson) in defense of Rachel. He was
critically wounded in several other duels and carried bullets from these encounters lodged in his
body until his death.
Despite (or perhaps in part because of) all this, Jackson was elected to the
Senate in 1823. Throughout his career and despite his perceived toughness Jackson built a loyal
cadre of supporters both inside and outside the halls of power. After the election of 1828, Andrew
Jackson and his Senate ally Richard Johnson began an investigation of the Second Bank of the
United States. Branches of the Bank had been so brazen during the election that they refused
loans to members of Jackson’s party. The Bank denied all allegations lodged against it. To
Jackson however, the privately owned Bank of the United States held too much power and its
well-compensated defenders could do nothing to persuade him otherwise. Although the bank’s
charter wasn’t set to expire until 1836, Biddle decided to request that Congress renew it in 1832.
Knowing that Jackson would surely veto the renewal, Biddle hoped this action would set off a tide
of anger amongst wealthy Easterners and prepare the way for Jackson’s defeat in the next election.
Henry Clay worked the Congress and the charter renewal was passed. When it came time
for Jackson to veto the bill, he issued a veto message whose tone is well captured in this excerpt:
It is to be regretted that the rich and powerful too often bend the acts of government to their
selfish purposes. Distinctions in society will always exist under every just government.
Equality of talents, of education, or of wealth can not be produced by human institutions.
In the full enjoyment of the gifts of Heaven and the fruits of superior industry, economy, and virtue, every man is
equally entitled to protection by law; but when the laws undertake to add to these
natural and just advantages artificial distinctions, to grant titles, gratuities, and exclusive privileges,
to make the rich richer and the potent more powerful, the humble members of societythe
farmers, mechanics, and laborers-who have neither the time nor the means of securing like
favors to themselves, have a right to complain of the injustice of their Government.
The anger of the Eastern establishment was nothing compared to the mass reaction that
Jackson’s rhetoric inspired, and he easily rode this wave to victory in the election and war.
|